tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5239290722575996816.post1105262516244821442..comments2023-11-23T11:12:37.953-06:00Comments on The Supplement - Catholic Commentary: Still More On CouncilsFred Noltiehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10203885485191808284noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5239290722575996816.post-43992125069627156392008-09-26T06:01:00.000-05:002008-09-26T06:01:00.000-05:00Hello Paul,Thanks!I agree with your analysis. It d...Hello Paul,<BR/><BR/>Thanks!<BR/><BR/>I agree with your analysis. It doesn't make much sense to argue that our view is self-defeating when the proof of the argument has nothing to do with our view, and it certainly seems that TF hasn't taken our view into consideration at all in presenting so-called "inconveniences" about the councils.<BR/><BR/>I had intended to address all of these posts of his Fred Noltiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10203885485191808284noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5239290722575996816.post-47629694381628354812008-09-26T00:21:00.000-05:002008-09-26T00:21:00.000-05:00RDP, Thank you for taking the time to critique TF'...RDP, Thank you for taking the time to critique TF's articles on Councils and giving a solid explanation for when a council is an ecumenical council. It seems that the only thing inconvenient about councils is the fact that TF refuses to review their validity using Catholic criteria. Instead, he wants to apply his own standard of review. I am busy putting the finishing touches on a response to Paul Hofferhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09182683665344747977noreply@blogger.com